Array

Präklinische Thrombolyse/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

(Auto-translated text.)
(Auto-translated text.)
 
Zeile 4: Zeile 4:
 
For longer transport times to a cardiology center, preclinical lysis is considered a Class IIb recommendation of the AHA. This means that lysis is preclinically only of questionable benefit and potentially dangerous.
 
For longer transport times to a cardiology center, preclinical lysis is considered a Class IIb recommendation of the AHA. This means that lysis is preclinically only of questionable benefit and potentially dangerous.
  
Ursache für diese derzeitige Einschätzung ist die Tatsache, dass die Akut-PTCA im Infarkt der Lyse überlegen ist. Bei vorheriger ineffektiver Lyse ist die PTCA im akuten Infarkt nur mehr fraglich effizient und nicht empfohlen. Zudem ist im kardiogenem Schock, einer möglichen Komplikation des akuten Myokardinfarktes, eine Lyse gänzlich unwirksam und ebenfalls nicht indiziert (Klasse III nach AHA). In diesen Fällen ist die einzige noch erfolgversprechende Therapie die Rescue-PTCA, deren Ergebnisse mit intraaortaler Gegenpulsation (Klasse I-Empfehlung der AHA) verbessert werden können, deren Einsatz unter der Wirkung von Thrombolytika kontraindiziert ist.
+
The reason for this current assessment is the fact that acute PTCA is superior to lysis in the infarct. If lysis is ineffective beforehand, the PTCA in acute infarction is only questionably efficient and not recommended. Moreover, in cardiogenic shock, a possible complication of acute myocardial infarction, lysis is completely ineffective and also not indicated (class III according to AHA). In these cases, the only promising therapy is rescue PTCA, the results of which can be improved with intra-aortic counterpulsation (Class I AHA recommendation), the use of which is contraindicated by thrombolytics.

Aktuelle Version vom 16. April 2019, 22:16 Uhr

Sprachen:
Deutsch • ‎English

Preclinical lysis is not indicated for transport times of less than 60 minutes (according to ERC) or less than 90 minutes (according to AHA and ACC).

For longer transport times to a cardiology center, preclinical lysis is considered a Class IIb recommendation of the AHA. This means that lysis is preclinically only of questionable benefit and potentially dangerous.

The reason for this current assessment is the fact that acute PTCA is superior to lysis in the infarct. If lysis is ineffective beforehand, the PTCA in acute infarction is only questionably efficient and not recommended. Moreover, in cardiogenic shock, a possible complication of acute myocardial infarction, lysis is completely ineffective and also not indicated (class III according to AHA). In these cases, the only promising therapy is rescue PTCA, the results of which can be improved with intra-aortic counterpulsation (Class I AHA recommendation), the use of which is contraindicated by thrombolytics.